The data to understand what AI does to thinking.
The framework to do something about it.
We measure and protect how students think at the moment they interact with AI — building the evidence base and equipping educators to act now, not a generation too late.
real-time AI cognition
with zero guardrails
AI education policy
market (2026)
We saw this with social media: the harm came first, the research a decade later, the regulation a generation too late. Our THINK Framework captures cognitive data at the point of AI interaction and equips educators to intervene now — building the evidence base and protecting students simultaneously.
Our Approach →
Measuring and protecting cognition in the age of AI.
We're building the infrastructure so that AI in education is guided by evidence, not litigation.
Building the Data
Our THINK Framework captures structured cognitive engagement data at the point of AI interaction — creating the first dataset on what actually happens to student thinking when they use AI tools. This data doesn't exist anywhere else. No AI company collects it. No school district has it. No researcher has measured it at scale.
Protecting Cognition
We don't just measure the problem — we intervene in real time. The THINK Platform prompts students to think critically before, during, and after every AI interaction. Educators get tools to act immediately, not wait for a longitudinal study to tell them what they already suspect: unchecked AI use is reshaping how students think.
Aligned with Alliance for Decision Education K–12 Standards
The only methodology that captures cognitive engagement data at the point of AI interaction while equipping students to think critically in real time.
What We Capture
Pre-interaction Intent
What the student planned to think before turning to AI.
Confidence Calibration
Certainty before and after AI use — tracking how AI shifts student self-assessment.
Cognitive Engagement Score
Did the student interrogate, hypothesize, or passively accept?
Bias Recognition
Anchoring, automation bias, or cognitive offloading — identified and tracked.
Process Reflection
What students learned about their own thinking after the interaction.
Platform & Prompt Context
Which AI tool, what type of query, and across which subject areas.
Advisory, education, and deployment — built on the same framework.
AI Risk Assessment & Design Sprint
- Analyze how AI tools affect cognition and decision quality
- Deliver recommendations to preserve human agency across workflows
- Custom frameworks for your organization's AI integration
Executive Briefings
- AI strategy, policy, and governance for leadership teams
- Grounded in regulatory reality, not hype
- Tailored to your industry and organizational context
THINK Workshop
- 3-hour professional development for teachers
- Practical AI-integrated instruction protocols
- Grounded in Decision Education principles
- Pre/post cognitive engagement surveys for baseline data
Student Program
- Two-session AI literacy curriculum, grades 6–12
- Cognitive self-defense before, during, and after AI use
- Students learn to recognize bias, automation trust, and offloading
Semester Pilot
- Full THINK deployment: teacher PD + student program
- THINK Platform: real-time cognitive prompts during every AI interaction
- Monthly coaching and impact reports
- Structured data collection for evidence-based outcomes
District Partnership
- Multi-school licensing and train-the-trainer certification
- District-wide analytics and ongoing advisory
- Data to inform your district's AI policy with evidence, not guesswork
Ready to bring the THINK Framework to your organization?
Start a ConversationThe people behind the work.
We bring deep expertise in AI, cognitive science, policy, education, and program design.
Let's talk.
Whether you're a school district exploring AI policy, a funder investing in education, or an organization navigating AI's impact on your team — we would love to hear from you.